Volume 10, Issue 3 (10-2022)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2022, 10(3): 35-42 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghazanfari M J, Chaghian Arani R, Mollaei A, Mollaei A, Falakdami A, Takasi P, et al . Death Anxiety and Related Factors in Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic Review. Jorjani Biomed J 2022; 10 (3) :35-42
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-902-en.html
1- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
2- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
5- Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
6- Associate Professor of Nursing, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
7- Assistant Professor, Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
8- 1. Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.2. Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.3. Quchan School of Nursing, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. , sami.karkhah@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 604 kb]   (1753 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5637 Views)
Full-Text:   (1432 Views)
Introduction
Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has had significantly impacted the health care system, especially nursing (1-11). High workload, insufficient resources, and many stressors in the workplace have led to the imposition of physical and psychological pressures on nurses, which exposes them to Death Anxiety (DA) (2). DA is a multifaceted concept that includes worries about fear of death for oneself and others, denial of death, reluctance to interact with dying people, and avoiding death. Although DA is a universal concept, its manifestations can vary in individuals with different cultural, mental, social, and professional backgrounds (12). Meanwhile, nurses are exposed to critically ill and dying patients, leading to stress, anxiety, and DA (13, 14). Adverse outcomes of DA among nurses include depression, loss of meaning in life, and psychological distress. These adverse outcomes can reduce professional participation, performance, and quality of care. However, some nurses deal with DA by using avoidant behaviors such as frequent absences from the workplace to reduce exposure to death-related issues and their psychological effects (12). Hence, a study in Turkey found that nurses experienced high levels of depression, anxiety, and insomnia during the COVID 19 pandemic compared to other health care workers (2). Another study in Turkey showed that the DA of nurtures was at a moderate level (15). Also, a study in Iran showed that 53.5% of nurses had high DA levels (16).
Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the DA and its associated factors in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and Methods
The present review was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) checklist (17).
Search strategy
An extensive search was conducted on Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) databases via keywords including "Death", "Death Anxiety", "Nurses", and "COVID-19", from December 2019 to November 10, 2021. The syntax used in the strategy of search in the PubMed database was (("Death anxiety") OR ("Death") OR ("Anxiety") OR (“Fear”)) AND ((“Nurses”) OR (“Personnel, Nursing”) OR (“Registered Nurses”) OR (“Registered Nurse”) OR (“Health Personnel”) OR (“Health Worker”) OR (“Health Caregiver”)) AND ((“COVID-19”) OR (“2019-nCoV disease”) OR (“Coronavirus”) OR (“Sars-Cov-2”) OR (“2019 novel coronavirus infection”)). The equivalent of keywords in Farsi was used to search Persian databases. The two researchers independently carried out the search process. Gray literature was ignored due to a lack of accurate findings (18).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Original Persian and English papers focusing on DA and related factors in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic were included in this systematic review. Case reports, conference proceedings, studies with qualitative designs, and reviews were excluded. Also, published studies aimed to assess the DA among nursing students were excluded from this review.
Study selection
EndNote X8 software was used to manage the data. Duplicate articles were deleted electronically and manually, respectively. The title, abstract, and full text of the studies were evaluated based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. In addition, a reference list of eligible papers was evaluated to prevent the loss of relevant data. The selection process of studies was conducted by two reviewers, independently. Studies related to the purpose of the present study were included based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The third researcher evaluated the paper if a disagreement arose between the reviewers.
Data extraction and quality assessment
The first author's name, year of publication, location, ward, sample size, male/female ratio, age, single /married ratio, level of education, work experience, tool, and key results were extracted from the included studies. Quality assessment of eligible papers was performed using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool). This tool assesses the quality of cross-sectional papers using 20 items (19). Data extraction and quality assessment of included studies were performed by two researchers independently. Studies with favorable quality were included in this systematic review. The third researcher evaluated the paper if a disagreement arose between the reviewers.
Results
Study Selection
1084 papers were obtained via search in databases, and two studies were obtained via assessment of the reference list of eligible documents. 211 duplicate studies were excluded. After evaluating the title and abstract of the articles, 649 papers were not in line with the purpose of this study, and 211 studies were not original. After evaluating the full text of the articles, four papers were included in this review (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The process of selecting studies
Study Characteristics
818 nurses were enrolled in four studies (15, 16, 20, 21). All studies were cross-sectional. Of the participants, 64.68% were female, 50.74% were married, and 94.49% had a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) degree. The mean age and work experience of nurses were 31.21 (SD=5.43) and 7.60 (SD=6.73) years, respectively. Most studies used the Templer’s Death Anxiety Scale (T-DAS) to evaluate nurses ’DA during the COVID-19 pandemic (n=3) (16, 20, 21). Most papers were performed in Iran (n=3) (16, 20, 21) (Table 1).
Methodological Quality of included study
Based on the AXIS tool, one study did not have a representative of the selection process; one study didn’t identify limitations of research; two papers didn’t mention sources of funding/conflicts of interest, and ethical approval/consent was attained (Figure 2).
DA and factors associated with its in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic
The mean DA in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic was 7.30 (SD=2.23). Also, 31.05% of nurses had a high DA level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Age (n=2), sex (n=1), work experience (n=1), working hours per week, childbearing, several patients needing endoflife care, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, cases of patient death (n=1), depression (n=1), mental health status (n=1), and life satisfaction (n=1) were influential factors in DA nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study in Iran found a significant negative relationship between DA and variables such as sex and mental health status (16). Also, another study in Turkey found a significant negative relationship between DA and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic (15).


Discussion
This systematic review showed that nurses' DA levels during the COVID-19 pandemic were moderate. Age, sex, work experience, working hours per week, childbearing, several patients needing endoflife care, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, cases of patient death, depression, mental health status, and life satisfaction were influential factors in DA nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Although nurses' DA was at a moderate level, there were vast differences in the DA range in the included studies (DA range in the included studies: 2.92% to 69.09%). A study in Turkey (15) showed that 14.35% of nurses had a high DA level. In contrast, a study in Iran (20) found that this rate was 69.09%. The causes of these contradictions include culture, religion, and nurses’ attitudes toward death and care for dying patients (16, 20, 22).
As presented in the present study, age, sex, work experience, working hours per week, childbearing, several patients needing endoflife care, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, cases of patient death, depression, mental health status, and life satisfaction were influential factors in DA nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic can predict DA in nurses (15). A study in Spain found that stress, anxiety, and high workload can lead to burnout in nurses and, ultimately, higher levels of DA in them (22). Therefore, it is recommended that future research be done by considering variables such as culture, religiosity, and religion in nurses in this field. Psychologists and behavioral scientists can play an essential role in reducing nurses' DA by developing educational interventions in this area.
Limitations
This review included English and Persian studies, which assess DA and related factors in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the main limitation of the present study was language bias. Also, not all studies in this field may be found despite a systematic search of various databases.
Implications for nursing managers and policymakers
Based on the findings of the present study, nurses' DA was at a moderate level during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current pandemic puts nurses at a high DA level due to increased workload and job stress which can affect the physical and mental health of nurses and, consequently, reduce the quality of nursing care. Therefore, nursing policymakers can reduce DA of nurses by using appropriate educational programs and coping strategies with DA to consider DA-related factors in nurses such as culture, religion, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, cases of patient death, depression, and mental health status, and life satisfaction.
Table 1. Features of eligible studies in this systematic review
 
First Author/year Location Ward Sample Size M/F ratio (%) Age
(mean±SD)
Single/Married ratio (%) Level of education (BSN/MSN/Ph.D.) (%) Work experience
(mean±SD)
Questionnaire Key results DA rate (Mean±SD)
Belash et al., 2021 (20) Iran ICU 110 N/A 31.47 (SD=2.10) 39.09/60.91 N/A N/A T-DAS
DA was among ICU nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic at the following levels:
  • 30.91% of nurses had a low DA level
  • 69.09% of nurses had a high DA level
There was a significant correlation between DA and variables such as age, working hours per week, childbearing, and several patients needing endoflife care, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, and cases of patient death.
8.93 (SD=3.79) out of 15
Farokhnezhad Afshar et al., 2021 (16) Iran Emergency department/ICU/Operating room/Oncology/Psychiatry/ General/dialysis/Nursing office 208 50.96/49.04 32.45 (SD=6.45) 43.75/56.25 91.35/8.65/0 9.24 (SD=7.53) T-DAS 53.36% of nurses had a high DA level during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant negative correlation between DA and variables such as sex (P=0.001) and mental health status (P < 0.05). 4.37 (SD=0.97) out of 15
Karabağ Aydın et al., 2021 (15) Turkey ICU/Emergency department/ Medical-surgical/Operating room 411 34.79/65.21 28.11 (SD=6.27) 62.04/37.96 100.00/0/0 5.96 (SD=5.94) R-DAS
Nurses' DA levels were moderate during the COVID-19 pandemic. DA was among nurses at the following levels:
  • 2.92% of nurses had a very low DA level
  • 31.39% of nurses had a low DA level
  • 51.34% of nurses had a moderate DA level
  • 14.35% of nurses had a very high DA level.
There was a significant negative correlation between DA and life satisfaction during the COVID19 pandemic (P < 0.05).
57.33 (SD=16.20) out of 100
Nobahar et al., 2021 (21) Iran General/ICU 89 20.22/79.78 32.80 (SD=6.90) 15.73/84.27 92.13/7.87/0 N/A T-DAS
Nurses' DA levels during the COVID-19 pandemic were as follows:
  • 30.34% of nurses had a low DA level
  • 60.67% of nurses had a moderate DA level
  • 8.99% of nurses had a high DA level.
There was a significant correlation between DA and variables such as age, work experience (P=0.05), and depression (P=0.05) during the COVID19 pandemic.
7.32 (SD=1.75) out of 15

Figure 2. Quality of eligible studies

Conclusion
Overall, nurses' DA levels during the COVID-19 pandemic were moderate. Also, 31.05% of nurses had a high DA level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Age, sex, work experience, working hours per week, childbearing, several patients needing endoflife care, cases of direct participation in resuscitation operations, cases of patient death, depression, mental health status, and life satisfaction were influential factors in DA nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, nursing policymakers should pay special attention to these factors related to nurses' health maintenance and promotion programs to increase the quality of nursing care for COVID-19 patients. Also, it is recommended that psychological and communication support be provided to nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 
Type of Article: Review Article | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2022/05/5 | Accepted: 2022/08/2 | Published: 2022/08/16

References
1. Mortazavi H. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review from a nursing perspective. BioMedicine. 2021;11(3):5-14. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
2. Şahin MK, Aker S, Şahin G, Karabekiroğlu A. Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, Distress and Insomnia and Related Factors in Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. Journal of Community Health. 2020;45(6):1168-77. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
3. Karkhah S, Asadian Rad M. A Survey for Predictors of Mortality among COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study from Iran. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal. 2021;9(4):13-21. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Karkhah S, Ghazanfari MJ, Shamshirian A, Panahi L, Molai M, Zeydi AE. Clinical features of patients with probable 2019 novel coronavirus infected pneumonia in Rasht, Iran: A retrospective case series. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;8(T1):16-22. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Javadi‐Pashaki N, Ghazanfari MJ, Karkhah S. COVID‐19 pandemic: An opportunity to promote e‐learning in the nursing profession. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
6. Ghazanfari MJ, Esmaeili S, Zeydi AE, Karkhah S. Moral distress among nurses during COVID‐19 pandemic: Challenges and coping strategies. Nursing Open. 2022;9(4):2227. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
7. Ghazanfari MJ, Karkhah S, Taghadosi M. Potential Interactions between Cardiovascular and Covid-19 Medication Regimens among Patients with Heart Failure. Pakistan Heart Journal. 2022;55(1):92-3. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Miri S, Karkhah S, Ghorbani Vajargah P, Mollaei A, Falakdami A, Takasi P, et al. Ethical Challenges and Coping Strategies about Issues Related to The Healthcare System and Social Issues During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal. 2022;10(1):84-95. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
9. Mobayen M, Ghazanfari MJ, Feizkhah A, Mobayen M, Zeydi AE, Karkhah S. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on burns care. Burns. 2022. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
10. Javadi-Pashaki N, Ghazanfari MJ, Miri S, Karkhah S. Decreased life expectancy among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic: A public health issue. Jorjani Biomedicine Journal. 2021;9(4):62-4. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Ghorbani Vajargah P, Miri S, Ghazanfari MJ, Farhadi Farouji A, Falakdami A, Mollaei A, et al. Effects of Corona Virus-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Older People. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. 2022;8:23337214221109822. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
12. Kagan M. Social support moderates the relationship between death anxiety and psychological distress among Israeli nurses. Psychological Reports. 2021;124(4):1502-14. [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Dadfar M, Lester D. The effectiveness of 8A model death education on the reduction of death depression: A preliminary study. Nursing open. 2020;7(1):294-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
14. Dadfar M, Lester D, Abdel-Khalek AM. Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the Death Anxiety Scale with nurses. Illness, Crisis & Loss. 2021;29(4):340-53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Karabağ Aydın A, Fidan H. The Effect of Nurses' Death Anxiety on Life Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. Journal of Religion and Health. 2021:1-16. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
16. Farokhnezhad Afshar P, Javadian H, Sadeghmoghaddam L, Farhadi A. Relationship between death anxiety and Mental Health of Nurses Working in Bushehr Persian Gulf Martyrs Hospital at the Time of Coronavirus Virus. Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management. 2021;10(2):0-. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
18. Corlett RT. Trouble with the gray literature. Biotropica. 2011;43(1):3-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ open. 2016;6(12):e011458. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
20. Belash I, Barzagar F, Mousavi G, Janbazian K, Aghasi Z, Ladari AT, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and death anxiety among intensive care nurses working at the Hospitals Affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Science. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021;10(7):2499. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
21. Nobahar M, Talebi E, Amaniyan S, Tarahomy M. Depression, Death Anxiety, and the Related Factors in Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients at Kosar Hospital, Semnan, Iran. International Journal of Health and Life Sciences. 2021;7(2). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Lázaro-Pérez C, Martínez-López JÁ, Gómez-Galán J, López-Meneses E. Anxiety about the risk of death of their patients in health professionals in Spain: Analysis at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(16):5938. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb